Skip to main content

You Can Now Lend Kindle Books

. . . and here's the link that tells you how.

Thanks, by the way to all of you who are using your gift cards to buy my books (and the books of all BoxOcto writers) on Kindle.  At least, I imagine that's what's accounting for the uptick!


I'm glad they've instituted what seems a fair and reasonable lending policy. As a reader, I know I"ll enjoy it, and as an author, I'm always happy for the book pimpage.
Ha ha ha, I just bought one! :) And isn't it hard to balance our needs as readers with our needs as writers in this arena? I used to go 100% for the reader before I started putting so much time into my own novel, but now I lean towards the writer's side in these legal matters. I've gone from being an avid patron of Half Price Books (sorry y'all) to frowning at Mark and saying "but what if everyone lends a copy on their Kindles?" Your comment, though, Colleen, seems to point towards a hopeful balance.
Mylène said…
The nice thing, Kat, is you can only lend a book once; you can only lend it for 14 days; and you can't read it yourself while you've lent it out. So my hope is that's it's a way to build audience in a (restrained) manner that will help the bottom line rather than eat into it. I do think it will tend to work better for those of us with multiple titles on Kindle (if someone likes a lent book, they may then buy another one), and I do think we need to negotiate this via our agents when it comes to deals (because the publisher decides whether a book can be lent or not; can decide it is lendable only for a short period of time; etc.). Something for debut authors to keep in mind.

We also have to remember people lent books (rather than bought them) back in the not-yet-dead days of hard- and paperbacks. And could lend them again and again. At the beginning of my career, I met with a book group who had all shared a single copy of The Medusa Tree (now I stipulate that all members of a group must buy the book if they would like me to attend their meeting--although I must say, e-readers will make that harder to confirm).

Popular posts from this blog

"The Curious Case of Benjamin Button": Did you love it or hate it?

Earlier this week, Colleen and I went to see "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button", the extraordinary movie based on a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald. I loved it. Colleen not s'much. (I was sitting there choked in tears at the end of the three hour film, so I only vaguely remember her saying something about "watching paint dry.") I want to see it again, so I'm trying to get the Gare Bear to go with me this weekend, but I won't be surprised if he reacts the same way Colleen did. The movie is long. And odd. It requires patience and a complete suspension of disbelief that modern audiences simply aren't trained for, so you've got to be in the right mood for it. The same is true of the short story, though the story and script have very little in common -- at least superficially. The story is very Fitzgerald (though it's not an example of his best writing, IMHO), and the setting -- Baltimore during the industrial revolution, Spanish Americ

APATHY AND OTHER SMALL VICTORIES by Paul Neilan is only good if you enjoy things like laughter

The only thing Shane cares about is leaving. Usually on a Greyhound bus, right before his life falls apart again. Just like he planned. But this time it's complicated: there's a sadistic corporate climber who thinks she's his girlfriend, a rent-subsidized affair with his landlord's wife, and the bizarrely appealing deaf assistant to Shane's cosmically unstable dentist. When one of the women is murdered, and Shane is the only suspect who doesn't care enough to act like he didn't do it, the question becomes just how he'll clear the good name he never had and doesn't particularly want: his own.