Skip to main content

NaPoMo QOTD What? It's Still Classy If It Can Mean Two Things...

"Syntax, like sex, is intimate."
- A Calling by Maxine Kumin* (PoLau '81-'82)

Syntax is deeply personal. I take great care to say exactly what I mean, especially when I write. (Seriously, totally not kidding when they say that once it's there, it's on the internet forever. That's alot of pressure.) After suffering a serious concussion, it was very hard for me to land on the exact word I wanted to use. People drove me insane inserting their own suggestions like some hyper-relevant game of Mad Libs. They would usually get gist of what I was trying to say, but I wanted the word I was thinking of. Not just any old nuance and sound. It's the difference between hate and loath, or otolaryngologist and ear, nose, and throat doctor. I mean, can you imagine if the first line of Elizabeth Bishop's "One Art" was "learning to misplace stuff is easy"? Only you can land on the perfect expression of what you mean, whether that's music, art, writing, dance. It's the unapologetic and courageous contact with that inherent intimacy that sets apart great art in any field.

Today is the anniversary of the opening of the first public library. For me, reading is an intensely personal experience. I make weird faces when I imagine characters' accents and I laugh and commentate what I'm reading. I love getting caught up in a wholly separate world that is different than how anyone else imagines it. Even though in some ways you're sharing the experience with everyone else who's read that book or poem, it is simultaneously a completely different and singular journey just for you.

So, there you have it. A definitive explanation of how reading poetry is kind of like watching a peep show. Intimate and communal, detached and visceral.

*From The Poets Laureate Anthology, published by W.W. Norton in association with the Library of Congress. Poem copyright Maxine Kumin.


Popular posts from this blog

"The Curious Case of Benjamin Button": Did you love it or hate it?

Earlier this week, Colleen and I went to see "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button", the extraordinary movie based on a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald. I loved it. Colleen not s'much. (I was sitting there choked in tears at the end of the three hour film, so I only vaguely remember her saying something about "watching paint dry.") I want to see it again, so I'm trying to get the Gare Bear to go with me this weekend, but I won't be surprised if he reacts the same way Colleen did. The movie is long. And odd. It requires patience and a complete suspension of disbelief that modern audiences simply aren't trained for, so you've got to be in the right mood for it. The same is true of the short story, though the story and script have very little in common -- at least superficially. The story is very Fitzgerald (though it's not an example of his best writing, IMHO), and the setting -- Baltimore during the industrial revolution, Spanish Americ

APATHY AND OTHER SMALL VICTORIES by Paul Neilan is only good if you enjoy things like laughter

The only thing Shane cares about is leaving. Usually on a Greyhound bus, right before his life falls apart again. Just like he planned. But this time it's complicated: there's a sadistic corporate climber who thinks she's his girlfriend, a rent-subsidized affair with his landlord's wife, and the bizarrely appealing deaf assistant to Shane's cosmically unstable dentist. When one of the women is murdered, and Shane is the only suspect who doesn't care enough to act like he didn't do it, the question becomes just how he'll clear the good name he never had and doesn't particularly want: his own.